| |
Researchers
and Practitioners: The Essential Partnership in Envisioning,
Understanding, and Supporting Reform
Excerpted
from a paper by Margaret Honey and Katie MacMillan Culp of
EDC's Center for Children and Technology ¹
Much
of our understanding of the relationship between technology and
school reform grows out of more than 10 years of collaboration
and partnership with the Union City Public Schools. This districtwhich
has been remarkably successful in transforming itself from a
failing urban system into a district where the vast majority
of children are doing well academicallyhas taught us much
of what we know about the systemic process of change. Our collaboration
with Union City has underscored a critical fact: that effective
school reformmeaning reforms that take root broadly across
multiple layers of the educational system, are sustained over
time, and result in demonstrable improvements in student learningdoes
not require technology. But simultaneously, much of what has
been accomplished in Union City has been greatly aided by the
ubiquitous growth of technology in the schools. In Union City,
technological investment was an integral part of a much larger
process of school reform. Technological tools were present that
allowed for forms of communication, student production, curriculum
development, and collaboration among students, teachers, and
administrators that simply would not otherwise have been possible
and that were part and parcel of the school system's process
of change.
Union City
has also taught us a number of other important lessons:
- Researchers
need to honor and privilege the knowledge
and expertise of the people who work in schools. Too
much
work
in the education fieldwhether it be breakthemold
school redesign initiatives or education research
in generalis characterized
by deficit thinking. Understanding schools
on their own terms and suspending judgment of what "should" be
in place are critical steps for researchers
to take in building
effective
collaborations.
- It is much
easier to work in partnership with
a school as a researcher or facilitator than it
is to work in
a school.
As researchers,
we do not depend on the school
for our livelihoodwe
can walk out the door, go home,
and not necessarily return the
next day. Local educators are the
ones who shoulder the majority of risk in reform efforts.
- Urban school
systems are political environments. Understanding the local
political context is essential to being able to work in partnership
with schools. Outsiders cannot do this alone. They need the
trust, wisdom, and insights of people working within the system
who can help to unpack political complexities.
We have also
learned through our experiences with Union City and other reform
initiatives using technology that five issuesleadership,
core vision, professional development, time, assessmentneed
to be coordinated in order for meaningful, sustainable school
improvement to occur. This process of coordination requires that:
- Leadership is anchored in a core vision of teaching and learning.
- Sustained
and intensive professional development takes place in the service
of the core vision, not simply around technology for its own
sake.
- The commitment
made by the school or district
to the process of change, and to the appropriation
of particular
technologies
for particular
purposes, is also a commitment
to an adequate period
of time to allow agreedupon changes
to unfold.
- There is
ample opportunitythat is, adequate professional
developmentto
allow educators to figure out how to use
technological tools to assist in carrying
out these changes
in teaching and learning.
- Assessments are developed that enable school leaders and faculty to determine
whether they are realizing their goals, and how to adjust if
necessary
For questions or comments, contact mosaic@edc.org.
Copyright 2000-2003
Education Development Center, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
|